Glossary · Swiss and international law
Indirect jurisdiction (PILA art. 26)
Test, at the time of recognising a foreign judgment in Switzerland, of the jurisdiction the foreign court would or could have had.
Reference : LDIP art. 26
When a foreign judgment is presented for recognition in Switzerland, the Swiss court does not re-examine the merits — but it verifies that the foreign court had jurisdiction under Swiss recognition rules.
This jurisdiction is given in particular :
- where the defendant was domiciled in the State of the seised court;
- where the matter falls within an international forum that Switzerland recognises;
- where the parties had validly submitted to that forum.
If indirect jurisdiction is not established, exequatur is refused even if the foreign judgment is otherwise regular.